Tue 23 Oct 2007
The Husband doesn’t know what’s about to hit him when he gets home. I don’t know whether to warm up the rolling pin or put a cot in the garage or both. Why is he in the doghouse? Because of his failure to bring me romantic gifts, of course! I got to thinking about that after reading this AP story “Clinton Talks of Bill’s Romantic Gifts.” No, I’m not making this up. It gets better than even that headline suggests the. Check this out:
Hillary Rodham Clinton says husband Bill often brings her romantic gifts: a giant wooden giraffe from an African trip, for example, and a Chanel watch that reminded him of teeth.
“Oh he’s so romantic,” the former first lady said in an interview for the November issue of Essence magazine. “He’s always bringing me back things from his trips.”
I don’t doubt that last statement. Herpes: it’s the gift that keeps on giving. And a giant wooden giraffe, too? What could be more romantic than that? Perhaps a copy of Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass. Oh wait …
And the Husband has never come close to anything as romantic as a watch that reminds him of my teeth. He’s never once brought me a present that shows how fondly he regards my chompers, or even shows that he’s thinking of them. I have to confess, I’ve never heard of any guy giving his beloved a romantic gift involving dental health, but then Bill Clinton has been known to has a special place in his heart for things oral, no?
Here’s the best part of this silly AP story:
“While sticking it out might not be for everyone, Mrs. Clinton said women should support each other in the choices they make in their marriages.
“I think it’s so important for women to stand up for the right of women to make a decision that is best for them,” she said.”
“While sticking it out might not be for every one? “ Are you kidding me? It’s clear that the AP writer has decided to throw in the towel and concede the obvious political agenda behind this silly article and go for the innuendo-based humor. (Shades of the Bill and Hill’s beach dance right before the Monica Lewinsky story hit.) Ok, I’ll bite, and no, that’s not an invitation for Bill Clinton to send me any teeth-themed gifts. Yes, Hillary, “sticking it out” might not be for everyone, but it seems to work for your old man, at least it did when he was in the Oval Office with his pants down around his ankles.
The writer’s succumbing to the irresistible impulse to mock Hillary and her attempt to convince the hopelessly gullible that she and Bill have a real marriage isn’t the really interesting part of that paragraph. The interesting part is the senator’s attempt to spin her willingness to tolerate the repeated humiliation inflicted on her by her zipper-challenged husband as an example of feminist empowerment. You thought her “sticking it out” with Bill despite his incessant cheating was about her bottomless pit of ambition that makes eating the excrement he served up year after year seem not only tolerable, but dare I say delicious. No, no, no. It’s all about a woman’s “right to choose,” and if you are for women’s rights, you’ll be all for it. Nice try, Hillarita, but most of us think standing up begins at home.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton
6 Responses to “Sticking It Out”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






October 23rd, 2007 at 9:30 pm
“I think it’s so important for women to stand up for the right of women to make a decision that is best for them,” [Mrs. Clinton] said.”
Muslim women can be forced into marriage at 9 years old, stoned to death for being raped, beaten by their husbands for any reason, and 90% suffer genital mutilation.
Mrs. Clinton: Stand up for the Right of women to make the decision that is best for them. If borders are meaningless, then you should be standing up for ALL women.
Unless, of course, that pant-suit is really a burka.
It’s a good thing Bubba didn’t give her a crocodile after one of his trips, the poor thing would end up like Socks. Now THAT would be romantic!
October 24th, 2007 at 9:45 am
[...] [Discuss this article with Teri….] Share Article [...]
October 24th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
Mensa,
As usual, you are spot on! What a GREAT point. Come to think of it, HRC might be better off in a burka than those hideous pantsuits, fashion-wise.
As for Socks, yes, it’s clear that he was just a prop, a 4-legged version of the human mascots the liberals use to try to foist their wrong-headed ideas on us.Don’t get me started on poor Buddy, the dog killed by the Clintons’ negligence, no doubt trying to escape from the snakepit of domestic disharmony that is their home. As he ran into the street, the poor dog was probably thinking “at least I won’t have to dodge any more flying ashtrays!”
October 29th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
jack…
Definitely, the most sensible thing i have seen in a long time….
November 1st, 2007 at 7:25 am
[...] all the details here No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> [...]
November 18th, 2007 at 10:22 pm
If Edwards or Obama can successfully challenge her, is that good for us?